Why mass spectrometry cannot tell you about an epimer posts 61–83
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.
The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.
Mass accuracy is expressed in parts per million. It is the difference between observed and theoretical mass divided by theoretical mass, multiplied by a million. A high-resolution instrument in good calibration achieves low single-digit ppm on a peptide of this size.
Tandem mass spectrometry: MS/MS fragments the molecular ion and uses fragment masses to confirm identity and detect modifications. A simple identity confirmation by LC-MS does not address post-translational modifications or impurities with the same or very close mass.
Resolution: "high resolution" commonly means <5 ppm across the mass range. Unit-resolution instruments achieve ±1 Da at best and cannot distinguish two species differing by less than 1 Da in total mass.
This follows post #65 rather than contradicting it.
Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.
What mass accuracy establishes: the measured mass is consistent with a specific composition. What it does not establish: purity, sequence order, stereochemistry, or the absence of an isobaric species. Every one of those requires something else.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
Calibration matters: a high-resolution instrument out of calibration can report mass with ppm error large enough to be uninformative. Check when the instrument was last calibrated before trusting the reported accuracy.
Quantitation by MS: most quantitation is done by LC-UV detection at 214 nm, not by MS, because extinction coefficients are better known. MS can quantify if an internal standard is used but that requires preparation.
Coming back to post #70, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Sample matrix effects: if a sample is dissolved in a complex matrix, other compounds in the matrix can suppress the peptide signal. Clean samples give higher sensitivity than dirty samples.
post #72 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Purity and identity are different questions: LC-MS establishes that the species at a retention time has the expected mass. It does not establish how much of the sample is that species (that is what LC-UV purity answers).
Electrospray ionisation produces multiply charged ions. For a 4 kDa peptide you expect mostly 2+, 3+, and 4+ charge states. Reading an electrospray spectrum means recognizing the envelope, not looking for one peak.
Mass accuracy is expressed in parts per million. It is the difference between observed and theoretical mass divided by theoretical mass, multiplied by a million. A high-resolution instrument in good calibration achieves low single-digit ppm on a peptide of this size.
What mass accuracy establishes: the measured mass is consistent with a specific composition. What it does not establish: purity, sequence order, stereochemistry, or the absence of an isobaric species. Every one of those requires something else.
post #76 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Charge states observed: for semaglutide (4113.6 Da) the doubly charged ion appears at m/z ≈ 2057, triply charged at ≈ 1371, quadruply at ≈ 1029. Those are the positions to look for; the heights depend on the ionization efficiency.
Worth separating two things that post #74 runs together.
Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.
Calibration matters: a high-resolution instrument out of calibration can report mass with ppm error large enough to be uninformative. Check when the instrument was last calibrated before trusting the reported accuracy.
Sample matrix effects: if a sample is dissolved in a complex matrix, other compounds in the matrix can suppress the peptide signal. Clean samples give higher sensitivity than dirty samples.
Quantitation by MS: most quantitation is done by LC-UV detection at 214 nm, not by MS, because extinction coefficients are better known. MS can quantify if an internal standard is used but that requires preparation.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
Worth separating two things that post #79 runs together.
Two things before anyone answers the substance.
First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number
On the subject in the title: Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it anywhere. A…
|
+100 | 113 | 48k | 13mo |
|
Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
|
+20 | 24 | 1.7k | 1d |
|
Isotope patterns and why the monoisotopic peak is not the tallest — does this still hold?
Isotope patterns and why the monoisotopic peak is not the tallest — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Working through the identity…
|
2 | 4.6k | 7h | |
|
Adducts: sodium, potassium, and the peak you did not expect — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Adducts: sodium, potassium, and the peak you did not expect — does this still hold? Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
+113 | 119 | 1.7k | 3mo |
|
Adducts: sodium, potassium, and the peak you did not expect
Adducts: sodium, potassium, and the peak you did not expect Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat…
|
+70 | 77 | 3.5k | 15mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags LC-MS, mass error (ppm), high-resolution MS
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Charge states for a 4 kDa peptide, worked through — the long version
Charge states for a 4 kDa peptide, worked through — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like…
|
2 | 293 | 3mo | |
|
Second pass at: MALDI versus ESI for a quick identity check
Second pass at: MALDI versus ESI for a quick identity check Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…
|
2 | 18k | 7mo | |
|
Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone — the long version
On the subject in the title: Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
+38 | 44 | 60k | 11mo |
|
Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number — the long version
Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I…
|
2 | 47k | 18mo | |
|
High-resolution MS on aggregates and what it can see
Posting this under the heading it deserves: High-resolution MS on aggregates and what it can see Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
|
+117 | 123 | 6.5k | 8mo |