The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Tags · Evidence

observational data

Cohort, registry and claims data, with the confounding that comes with it.

67 topics 21 solved Group: Evidence

Related in this group: STEP programme · SURMOUNT programme · SURPASS programme · SELECT trial · FLOW trial · SOUL trial · TRIUMPH programme · PIONEER programme · SUSTAIN programme · LEADER trial · randomised trial · meta-analysis

67 topics · page 2 of 3

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Reverse causation in a cohort study of weight and outcome
On the subject in the title: Reverse causation in a cohort study of weight and outcome Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) with FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) and…
LVDRIEDDN+10 14 11k 7mo
Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate
Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021). Please read it before posting; the…
SSLMAA 2 55k 7mo
Critiquing an observational claim about a class effect — one year on
Critiquing an observational claim about a class effect — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support of a claim…
FELDKRAWDO+5 9 3.2k 8mo
Revisiting: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem
Revisiting: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies…
RAZAR 2 56k 9mo
Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…
CPEKLMHK 3 24k 9mo
Coming back to: A community side-effect dataset, with its response rate and biases
On the subject in the title: A community side-effect dataset, with its response rate and biases Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies…
AATSCNPMA+27 31 46k 9mo
Reading a rodent study on a secretagogue without over-extrapolating
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Reading a rodent study on a secretagogue without over-extrapolating Everything below is what sits behind that. I have seen STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) cited in support of…
EKLLTVOF+50 54 32k 10mo
BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not
BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support of a…
PILSTMIAK+44 48 3k 10mo
Analytical identity of BPC-157: a 15-mer with a simple mass
Analytical identity of BPC-157: a 15-mer with a simple mass Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med , 2024) with STEP 2 (…
MRFNLVWPII+3 7 5.2k 10mo
Reverse causation in a cohort study of weight and outcome — a second dataset
Reverse causation in a cohort study of weight and outcome — a second dataset Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med ,…
MRAKANKBVK+112 131 1.5k 10mo
Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats — a second dataset
Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like…
CWFNHLTHRE+127 151 42k 10mo
Second pass at: Why this subcategory is stricter about sourcing than most
Second pass at: Why this subcategory is stricter about sourcing than most — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016) with SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA ,…
AWGHTVCDAS+120 129 61k 11mo
Confounding by indication, explained with a concrete example
On the subject in the title: Confounding by indication, explained with a concrete example Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) with SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med ,…
TVARBDSBCD+21 25 21k 11mo
Immortal time bias in a claims-database study
Immortal time bias in a claims-database study — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
MACDSOIDNN+29 34 28k 11mo
TB-500 and thymosin beta-4: the fragment versus the protein
TB-500 and thymosin beta-4: the fragment versus the protein Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a…
COGDJLDVS+107 118 22k 11mo
BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019)…
WNCDSOOSB+77 84 54k 11mo
IGF-1 as a surrogate endpoint and its limitations — the long version
On the subject in the title: IGF-1 as a surrogate endpoint and its limitations — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do…
NOMGCRKBGP+14 18 53k 12mo
About the Datasets category
Community-collected datasets, their collection methods, and their limitations. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a…
BNOFSVPSAA+6 11 42k 12mo
About the Repair & healing peptides category
BPC-157, TB-500 and similar. Mostly preclinical evidence; this subcategory is strict about not overstating it. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit…
SLHSENALEF 4 19k 13mo
Whether an aggregate is worth publishing at all: a disputed topic
On the subject in the title: Whether an aggregate is worth publishing at all: a disputed topic Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
PEGLIGHNMD+20 24 18k 13mo
Why plausible mechanism is not evidence of effect
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why plausible mechanism is not evidence of effect Session topic: STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it before posting; the discussion is much…
FYGFSPCNAK+14 18 57k 13mo
A claim built entirely on a subgroup analysis
A claim built entirely on a subgroup analysis Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support of a claim I do…
ASKHMIASNP+71 80 1.1k 14mo
A well-designed study with a badly written abstract
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A well-designed study with a badly written abstract Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015) with LEADER ( N Engl J Med ,…
RCMICBMRPN+117 128 7.2k 14mo
Follow-up: Tesamorelin has an approved indication — what that changes about the evidence
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Tesamorelin has an approved indication — what that changes about the evidence Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) with…
RLHFTDIBBW+63 68 18k 14mo
Critiquing an observational claim about a class effect
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Critiquing an observational claim about a class effect Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015). Please read it before…
VRRIJV 2 6.9k 14mo
Ipamorelin selectivity claims and where they came from — a second dataset
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Ipamorelin selectivity claims and where they came from — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. I have seen SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021)…
TIDCM 2 27k 14mo
Coming back to: A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author
A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do not…
IAQLJB 2 1.3k 14mo
Criticising the method without criticising the authors
Criticising the method without criticising the authors Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in support of a claim…
KBZOKOJMTV+55 61 60k 15mo
Revisiting: Oral versus injected administration claims for BPC-157
On the subject in the title: Revisiting: Oral versus injected administration claims for BPC-157 Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) cited in support of a claim I…
IGAAILRILD+23 27 7.7k 15mo
Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem Everything below is what sits behind that. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
BVLDNLAIEK+1 5 12k 15mo