Tags · Evidence
observational data
Cohort, registry and claims data, with the confounding that comes with it.
Related in this group: STEP programme · SURMOUNT programme · SURPASS programme · SELECT trial · FLOW trial · SOUL trial · TRIUMPH programme · PIONEER programme · SUSTAIN programme · LEADER trial · randomised trial · meta-analysis
67 topics · page 2 of 3
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Reverse causation in a cohort study of weight and outcome
On the subject in the title: Reverse causation in a cohort study of weight and outcome Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) with FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) and…
|
+10 | 14 | 11k | 7mo |
|
Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate
Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021). Please read it before posting; the…
|
2 | 55k | 7mo | |
|
Critiquing an observational claim about a class effect — one year on
Critiquing an observational claim about a class effect — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support of a claim…
|
+5 | 9 | 3.2k | 8mo |
|
Revisiting: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem
Revisiting: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies…
|
2 | 56k | 9mo | |
|
Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…
|
3 | 24k | 9mo | |
|
Coming back to: A community side-effect dataset, with its response rate and biases
On the subject in the title: A community side-effect dataset, with its response rate and biases Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies…
|
+27 | 31 | 46k | 9mo |
|
Reading a rodent study on a secretagogue without over-extrapolating
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Reading a rodent study on a secretagogue without over-extrapolating Everything below is what sits behind that. I have seen STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) cited in support of…
|
+50 | 54 | 32k | 10mo |
|
BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not
BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support of a…
|
+44 | 48 | 3k | 10mo |
|
Analytical identity of BPC-157: a 15-mer with a simple mass
Analytical identity of BPC-157: a 15-mer with a simple mass Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med , 2024) with STEP 2 (…
|
+3 | 7 | 5.2k | 10mo |
|
Reverse causation in a cohort study of weight and outcome — a second dataset
Reverse causation in a cohort study of weight and outcome — a second dataset Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med ,…
|
+112 | 131 | 1.5k | 10mo |
|
Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats — a second dataset
Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like…
|
+127 | 151 | 42k | 10mo |
|
Second pass at: Why this subcategory is stricter about sourcing than most
Second pass at: Why this subcategory is stricter about sourcing than most — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016) with SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA ,…
|
+120 | 129 | 61k | 11mo |
|
Confounding by indication, explained with a concrete example
On the subject in the title: Confounding by indication, explained with a concrete example Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) with SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med ,…
|
+21 | 25 | 21k | 11mo |
|
Immortal time bias in a claims-database study
Immortal time bias in a claims-database study — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
|
+29 | 34 | 28k | 11mo |
|
TB-500 and thymosin beta-4: the fragment versus the protein
TB-500 and thymosin beta-4: the fragment versus the protein Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a…
|
+107 | 118 | 22k | 11mo |
|
BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019)…
|
+77 | 84 | 54k | 11mo |
|
IGF-1 as a surrogate endpoint and its limitations — the long version
On the subject in the title: IGF-1 as a surrogate endpoint and its limitations — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do…
|
+14 | 18 | 53k | 12mo |
|
About the Datasets category
Community-collected datasets, their collection methods, and their limitations. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a…
|
+6 | 11 | 42k | 12mo |
|
About the Repair & healing peptides category
BPC-157, TB-500 and similar. Mostly preclinical evidence; this subcategory is strict about not overstating it. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit…
|
4 | 19k | 13mo | |
|
Whether an aggregate is worth publishing at all: a disputed topic
On the subject in the title: Whether an aggregate is worth publishing at all: a disputed topic Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
+20 | 24 | 18k | 13mo |
|
Why plausible mechanism is not evidence of effect
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why plausible mechanism is not evidence of effect Session topic: STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it before posting; the discussion is much…
|
+14 | 18 | 57k | 13mo |
|
A claim built entirely on a subgroup analysis
A claim built entirely on a subgroup analysis Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support of a claim I do…
|
+71 | 80 | 1.1k | 14mo |
|
A well-designed study with a badly written abstract
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A well-designed study with a badly written abstract Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015) with LEADER ( N Engl J Med ,…
|
+117 | 128 | 7.2k | 14mo |
|
Follow-up: Tesamorelin has an approved indication — what that changes about the evidence
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Tesamorelin has an approved indication — what that changes about the evidence Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) with…
|
+63 | 68 | 18k | 14mo |
|
Critiquing an observational claim about a class effect
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Critiquing an observational claim about a class effect Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015). Please read it before…
|
2 | 6.9k | 14mo | |
|
Ipamorelin selectivity claims and where they came from — a second dataset
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Ipamorelin selectivity claims and where they came from — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. I have seen SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021)…
|
2 | 27k | 14mo | |
|
Coming back to: A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author
A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do not…
|
2 | 1.3k | 14mo | |
|
Criticising the method without criticising the authors
Criticising the method without criticising the authors Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in support of a claim…
|
+55 | 61 | 60k | 15mo |
|
Revisiting: Oral versus injected administration claims for BPC-157
On the subject in the title: Revisiting: Oral versus injected administration claims for BPC-157 Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) cited in support of a claim I…
|
+23 | 27 | 7.7k | 15mo |
|
Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem Everything below is what sits behind that. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
+1 | 5 | 12k | 15mo |