The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Journal club: STEP 8 and the fairness of the comparator dose — a second dataset

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 23, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
JF
j.fonsecaTL2 Moderator20 Apr 2026#6
dr_seong, post #3: SELECT (N Engl J Med 2023): Semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes without diabetes. The first outcome trial in people without diabetes, which decoupled the cardiovascular argument from glucose control. Read the absolute numbers, not just the relative reduction. Go to post

SURMOUNT-OSA (N Engl J Med 2024): Tirzepatide in obstructive sleep apnoea, using an objective physiological endpoint. Notable because soft endpoints are avoided. Two parallel trials addressed the confounder directly.

22 likes in reply to #3 3mo
ML
m.lehtinenTL2 Moderator16 May 2026#10

STEP 1 (N Engl J Med 2021): The pivotal obesity trial for semaglutide and the reference point for most subsequent comparison. Mean weight reduction was substantially larger than anything previously achieved pharmacologically.

30 likes 2mo
SR
s.radichTL2 Moderator22 May 2026#11
o.lindgren, post #1: Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: STEP 8 and the fairness of the comparator dose — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021). Please read it before posting; the discussion is much better when everyone has. The question I would like us to start with… Go to post

I read post #9 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

FLOW (N Engl J Med 2024): Semaglutide renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Stopped early for efficacy. Component-by-component analysis is essential because the components differ in how patient-important they are.

28 likes in reply to #1 2mo
FF
f.fenwickTL3Regular12 Jul 2026#20

This follows post #17 rather than contradicting it.

Session format: read the paper before posting. The discussion is much better when everyone has. Start with the estimand and population, then methods, then results, then limitations. That order makes critique coherent.

27 likes 16d
SC
s.coelhoTL2 Moderator22 Jul 2026#22

TRIUMPH (ongoing): Retatrutide phase 3. No results yet. Nothing should be attributed to it because it has not finished. When it does, this discussion will return to it.

25 likes 6d

Read the full topic (23 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Journal club: LEADER as the historical anchor
Journal club: LEADER as the historical anchor Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) with SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024) and…
AKACRIGKR+103 110 8.1k 2h
[2026 update] Journal club: PIONEER 6 as a safety trial
Journal club: PIONEER 6 as a safety trial Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support of a claim I do not…
PPKAVJFBE+14 18 55k 5mo
[2026 update] Journal club: SURPASS-2 and the semaglutide 1 mg comparator
Journal club: SURPASS-2 and the semaglutide 1 mg comparator Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it before…
EDHCITINR+126 138 31k 17mo
Journal club: the CagriSema phase 2 combination paper — a second dataset
Journal club: the CagriSema phase 2 combination paper — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in support of a…
ADACLMAK+74 79 2.3k 13mo
[2026 update] Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session
Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
NVAVRJVBV+5 9 4.2k 1d

Related topics — sharing the tags risk of bias, journal club, effect size

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Washout with a one-week half-life: the arithmetic
Washout with a one-week half-life: the arithmetic — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
SKTPBLCSF+90 96 44k 20mo
Tracking a preprint to publication: a worked example — the long version
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Tracking a preprint to publication: a worked example — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) with STEP 2 (…
PBHJEFAKGC+38 47 560 22mo
Tirzepatide storage and stability: what is published versus what is assumed
On the subject in the title: Tirzepatide storage and stability: what is published versus what is assumed Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022). Please read…
APPOELIGR+17 21 17k 12d
Why cagrilintide alone is discussed so much less than in combination — does this still hold?
Why cagrilintide alone is discussed so much less than in combination — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Session topic: SURMOUNT-4…
SBKRSICPMN+27 31 1.2k 22h
Why cagrilintide alone is discussed so much less than in combination
Why cagrilintide alone is discussed so much less than in combination I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Session topic: SURMOUNT-OSA ( N Engl J Med ,…
MENVRFCHKB+93 108 35k 16mo